Reassessing the Foundations of Bureaucratic Accountability: A Critical Examination of Paradigmatic Limitations in Public Governance

Abstract

This study critically evaluates the established concepts of bureaucratic accountability within the framework of public governance, highlighting the inherent paradigmatic limitations that have shaped current practices. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, including qualitative interviews with public administrators and quantitative survey data, we analyze the disconnect between theoretical postulations and practical implementations. Through this analysis, we unveil the discrepancies that hinder effective accountability mechanisms and propose a reformed model that better aligns with contemporary governance challenges. Our findings indicate that the existing accountability frameworks are insufficient for addressing the complexities of modern public administration, necessitating a shift towards more adaptable and transparent processes. This critical re-evaluation serves as a call to action for scholars and practitioners alike to reconsider the foundational principles guiding bureaucratic accountability in public administration.